How can a dismissed junior bureaucrat enter an Ottoman government office two-and-a-half years after he is dismissed to steal highly “secret documents” that were allegedly destroyed in the first place? Does any of this make sense to you? Misleading quotations, selective use of sources, fake dates and signatures, poor Turkish grammar and punctuation, non-existent characters, fabricated documents, and more. Some unscrupulous scholars still use these “forged documents” as “the smoking gun” of the alleged Armenian Genocide. Yeah, a gun that never smoked; a gun that was not even a gun… Welcome to the “AndonianLand” of fairy tales!
Myths and Realities
Add comment